Funny how they thought bombing a bunch of other countries was FINE when Glorious Lightbringer Comrade Obama did it. Funny. I'm not laughing though, lefty assholes. "Elections have consequences."
"we need an old-school CIA internal strife support to knock down the remaining mullahs and substitute them with less stupid people"
We already did that in the 50s in Iran which is what kicked off this whole domino fall we're in. So it didn't actually start in 79. Not saying either side is right (in an argument there is wrong on both sides) just that there is more history and they didn't start it. OTOH I'm not in favor of any nation based on a policy/religion of world dominion having nukes (Islam, Judaism cough cough). Of course Iran could probably buy one from N Korea, maybe Pakistan.
So the Soviets double cross them after WWII and we, the "good guys" finally pull our heads out our butt. A few years pass, very few, and then, well, oh, if only to have had a crystal ball in 1953 . . .
Correct about the low intensity conflict with Iran. Although both Russia and China have/are supporting Iran, its a tenuous relationship.
Both Russia and China have significant Muslim populations that conduct Uncivil acts periodically; ones that are suppressed with brutal force. Sponsored by.... Iran! No diplomatic or economic effort has been able to get the Iranians to stop thief duplicitous behavior.
I'll bet both Putin and Xi are secretly high fiving Trump for wrecking Iran's nuclear ambitions and maybe even helping in the shadows.
Speaking of 'Mad', the tards on the left are already squealing about impeachment.... again.
Truth be told I want them to file articles of impeachment every week and keep it in the news 24/7. Show the whole country how deranged they are.
Funny how they thought bombing a bunch of other countries was FINE when Glorious Lightbringer Comrade Obama did it. Funny. I'm not laughing though, lefty assholes. "Elections have consequences."
And and bobbed their heads in unison w/ 'I have a telephone and a pen...."
"we need an old-school CIA internal strife support to knock down the remaining mullahs and substitute them with less stupid people"
We already did that in the 50s in Iran which is what kicked off this whole domino fall we're in. So it didn't actually start in 79. Not saying either side is right (in an argument there is wrong on both sides) just that there is more history and they didn't start it. OTOH I'm not in favor of any nation based on a policy/religion of world dominion having nukes (Islam, Judaism cough cough). Of course Iran could probably buy one from N Korea, maybe Pakistan.
So the Soviets double cross them after WWII and we, the "good guys" finally pull our heads out our butt. A few years pass, very few, and then, well, oh, if only to have had a crystal ball in 1953 . . .
re crystal ball: not like there aren't plenty examples in history of meddling in other countries regimes leading to FAFO. Probably the CIA motto (FA).
Correct about the low intensity conflict with Iran. Although both Russia and China have/are supporting Iran, its a tenuous relationship.
Both Russia and China have significant Muslim populations that conduct Uncivil acts periodically; ones that are suppressed with brutal force. Sponsored by.... Iran! No diplomatic or economic effort has been able to get the Iranians to stop thief duplicitous behavior.
I'll bet both Putin and Xi are secretly high fiving Trump for wrecking Iran's nuclear ambitions and maybe even helping in the shadows.