Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MartyB's avatar

Could’ve let the editorial staff and publishers watch from the inside. What a missed opportunity. Oh well…

Expand full comment
Blind Archer's avatar

"I don’t know if hate is even applicable in my case as it feels something you apply to somebody that has some worth."

I had a manager at work, a few jobs ago, who said one of the wisest things I've ever heard coming out of a live human being.

(Paraphrasing): "The opposite of love is not hate. Hate is a very small step to the left of love; both are strong feelings. No, the real opposite of love is apathy. When you just don't care, that's the opposite of love."

Journalists in the digital age thrive on clicks and people sharing their writings. Whether you love and agree with it, or hate and disagree with it, *you're still re-sharing it*. The journalist gets paid by the click; they make money either way. "No such thing as bad publicity," and all that.

(In a way, IMO that's one reason why journalism has gotten so bad in the past few decades. Facts and news are boring and predictable, but click-bait outrage-fests and controversial hit-pieces get lots of clicks, and clicks pay the bills.)

So treat journalists the way we treat mass-shooters. Don't publish them, don't publish their names, don't share or re-post any of their screeds. Don't give them any of the attention they need.

The worst thing you can do to a journalist vying for your attention is to shrug and say "Meh."

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts