Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Blind Archer's avatar

"It is my belief that the safety issue is related to some design clash between the gun itself and retention holsters."

Nope.

https://youtu.be/LfnhTYeVHHE

48-minute video, but worth the time if you have it.

TL;DR: The FBI's Ballistic Research Facility (BRF) tested one of the Michigan State Police P320s that "fired uncommanded", which they received untouched in its duty holster after it went off -- in which multiple witnesses to the event state the officer in question had his hands at chest level and was holding his keys -- did a pretty thorough check of all the internals, and ran multiple tests against it and two new, unfired MSP pistols. They found several problems, culminating in the conclusion that a law enforcement officer's normal duty activities (running, jumping, climbing, fighting, pressing the holstered gun against a wall or side of a vehicle, etc.) cause enough movement within the duty holster to render the internal safeties inoperable.

My non-certified-engineer observation: It's too early to tell if it's a flawed design or poor manufacturing tolerances or just bad quality control, but it doesn't matter; those tests run by the FBI do not look good.

Expand full comment
Tom from WNY's avatar

I'm sure this memo ain't good news for SIG. It seems that the mismatch of SIG P320, WML attached, holster for such gun + light and loose clothing or small fingers grabbing has contributed quite a bit to the reports of "it went off all by itself".

Maybe a case of "I gotta keep taking the poison, 'cause it cures my disease."?

Expand full comment

No posts