Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tantiv V's avatar

She was 'badly' trying to overturn Bruen... 'So we 'shouldn't' look at the history... blah blah' while at the same time completely ignoring basic COTUS law.

Jeezus she's a moron.

Paul Woods's avatar

I've wondered how long it would take for the Dems to utilize this argument to go around the "history" portion of the Bruen decision. Historically, early gun control laws were aimed at preventing blacks, and the minorities from being able to defend themselves against armed mobs or corrupt law enforcement. The irony of a black Justice using this argument is rich. Also by her argument, "separate but equal" laws were constitutional up until Brown v. Board of Education said it wasn't. To quote that famous philosopher, Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon."

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?