My favorite part is the prime example of "gun guy thinking". Could it be the extension is for the plus 1 round, was it for the bayonet lug, or is it just cool? Correct answer is: YES! 😁
I bet the recoil is a doozy from that short barrel revolver. I have a S&W .357 with a barrel perhaps a bit shorter, and it stings enough that I only very rarely put .357 in it. The .38 target ammo is quite harsh enough for me. I always wonder how much my late sister-in-law shot it; she had it as her daily carry gun, and she was about 5'0" and 100 lbs.
“I have reached the conclusion . . . that under the First and Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
- Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio 1964
My favorite part is the prime example of "gun guy thinking". Could it be the extension is for the plus 1 round, was it for the bayonet lug, or is it just cool? Correct answer is: YES! 😁
I bet the recoil is a doozy from that short barrel revolver. I have a S&W .357 with a barrel perhaps a bit shorter, and it stings enough that I only very rarely put .357 in it. The .38 target ammo is quite harsh enough for me. I always wonder how much my late sister-in-law shot it; she had it as her daily carry gun, and she was about 5'0" and 100 lbs.
I notice you use your support hand to unload the revolver. Do you use your support hand to reload the revolver?
I was taught differently is why I ask.
That was done for photo purposes as it is the most visible. I go with Massad Ayoob's Stressfire reload.
Gun porn, even if it is not really porn, is best porn.
Porn is in the eye of the beholder.
“I have reached the conclusion . . . that under the First and Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
- Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio 1964